## #6 - If Max were guilty, he would not ask the police to

PowerScore Staff

Posts: 6579
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:19 pm
Points: 3,251

Complete Question Explanation

Parallel Reasoning-SN. The correct answer choice is (A)

The first sentence of this stimulus provides the following conditional diagram:
Max guilty → (not) ask police to investigate
Contrapositive:
Ask police to investigate → Max not guilty
As we can see from the above, the conclusion drawn by the author reflects a valid contrapositive, so the correct answer choice should reflect the same.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice, as it does indeed reflect a valid contrapositive. The statement and contrapositive can be diagrammed as follows:
Statement: Lucille in next room → I could not see her
Contrapositive: I can see her → Lucille not in next room
Since the conclusion provided by this statement reflects a valid contrapositive, this answer choice perfectly parallels the reasoning in the stimulus.

Answer choice (B): This answer choice provides neither a good parallel nor a valid conclusion. The flawed reasoning can be diagrammed as follows:
Statement: Sam were rich → (not) spend vacation in Alaska
Invalid conclusion: (not) spend vacation in Alaska → Sam rich
The above reasoning reflects a Mistaken Reversal, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): Here we have another Mistaken Reversal, and another incorrect answer choice, which can be diagrammed as follows:
Statement: Joe over 40 → (not) want to learn to ski
MR Conclusion: (not) want to learn to ski → Joe over 40

Answer choice (D): This choice also reflects an invalid conclusion, so this answer choice is incorrect, but in this case we have a Mistaken Negation:
Statement: Mark good cook → (not) put cinnamon in chili
Mark not good cook → put cinnamon in chili
As we can see from the above diagram, both sides have been negated, but no reversed, so this is a classis Mistaken Negation.

Answer choice (E): This answer choice does reflect valid reasoning, but still fails to parallel the stimulus perfectly. Whereas correct answer choice (A) reflects a valid contrapositive, this answer choice merely reflects a valid restatement:
Statement: Sally sociable → (not) avoid friends
Conclusion: Sally sociable → (not) avoid friends
Because this answer choice does not parallel the stimulus as closely as answer choice (A), answer choice (E) is incorrect.
icanshoot325
LSAT Novice

Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:55 pm
Points: 0

I'm having a little trouble understanding why the answer is A but not E?
Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff

Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:31 am
Points: 1,208

Hi icanshoot325,

Welcome to the Forum!

Answer choice (E) contains a mere restatement of the original argument; what you need is a valid contrapositive, which is provided in answer choice (A). [Admin note: We have moved this question to the thread explaining this question.] After consulting the full explanation, feel free to ask a question on the Forum if there is still anything left unclear.

Good luck!
Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Test Preparation