So I am reviewing my last practice test, wrong and right answers, as per Nikki advice, and already I am finding I need the explanations for multiple problems. Can I find these online somewhere? Or should I just list them here and you guys can help me out? If I can find them online it would be great if you guys could tell me where. But just in case they aren't on here, here are the problems I re-picked wrong answers for or didn't quite understand:
#18- I fell for answer choice C twice, because I was not certain which was the conclusion. I thought however, was a counter-premise indicator in the stimulus, but its the conclusion??)
Thanks in advance guys!
#18- There is little plausibility to the claim that it is
7 posts • Page 1 of 1
There are no explanations for the practice tests, but we'd be happy to discuss them on the forum.
Regarding #18, the word "however" is a counter-premise indicator, but it can also be used in a more general sense to indicate a counterargument: it all depends on the structure of the counterargument. Here, the last sentence supports the preceding one, as it explains why there is wisdom behind the injunction against being judgmental. Therefore, the conclusion is the third sentence of the stimulus.
Answer choice (C) is incorrect for two separate reasons: First, having "little plausibility" is not quite the same as having "some" plausibility. If you think about it, they have almost opposite meanings. Do you see why? Second, the main conclusion is not the first sentence of the stimulus due to the presence of the counterargument as described above.
Hope this helps!
PowerScore Test Preparation
Hi, I am still confused with this question.
Can you please explain to me the difference between "there is little plausibility" and "there is some plausibility" ?
I am understanding that if there is little there exists some plausibility. But obviously this is not correct.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
First, just want to make sure that we're clear that the main conclusion is the third sentence in the stimulus. The argument is structured thus:
The distinction between "some plausibility" and "little plausibility" concerns the first statement in the stimulus.
Let's discuss this concept with three hypothetical examples:
What does each of these statements imply?
Notice the difference between statements 2 and 3 above. In statement 2, there is definitely a chance. In statement 3, there could be a chance, or there might not be a chance.
This distinction also holds for the term "few," as in:
I hope this helps!
Thank you very much for your hypotheticals and for providing a thorough explanation. I also appreciate you including the examples of "few". Thanks!
The explanations regarding why the correct answer is the only correct answer are very helpful. However, It has not yet been established if there are indeed, two separate conclusions in this argument. (Only one of which is reproduced and credited in answer E.)
Premise: People must assess one another and not all assessments will be positive.
Conclusion 1: ThereforeThere is little plausibility to claim that it is absurd to criticize anyone for being critical. (emphasis mine)
Premise: To be judgmental is not merely to assess someone negatively, but to do so prior to making an effort to understand.
Conclusion 2: There is wisdom behind the injunction against being judgmental.
My question: Perhaps what appears to be conclusion #1 in my evaluation, is really a sub-conclusion that gives some sort of support to the main conclusion (#2, which is the credited response)?
Thanks for the question and the explanation - you are right that there are two conclusions in this stimulus, and they are the two you note. And you are right as well that only one of those one of those two conclusions is reproduced in answer E, making it the right answer. I also think you are right that your "conclusion #1" is a subconclusion - it is a statement intended to set up the main conclusion that "There is wisdom behind the injunction against being judgmental." Nice work!
7 posts • Page 1 of 1