to the top

#20 - On some hot days the smog in Hillview reaches

Dianapoo
LSAT Leader
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:37 am
Points: 27

Hi!

I was wondering if A would have been a Good answer if it said:

mistake a condition that sometimes accompanies unsafe smog with one that is SUFFFICIENT for it.

Say the sun is sufficent for smog: sun --> smog

The other stays the same: wind blows <-s-> sun

Put these together: wind blows <-s-> sun --> smog

Use Dave's some train and boom wind blows <-s-> smog

Now we can see why the author came to that conclusion! Thus my version of A would be an answer?

Thank you! I'm trying to get a little creative :-D
Adam Brinker
PowerScore Staff
PowerScore Staff
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:25 am
Points: 37

Hi Diana,

Does the explanation of this question here help:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=3463

Please let us know. Thanks!
Adam Brinker
PowerScore Test Preparation
Dianapoo
LSAT Leader
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:37 am
Points: 27

Adam Brinker wrote:Hi Diana,

Does the explanation of this question here help:
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=3463

Please let us know. Thanks!


Hi Adam!

I totally get the answer, I was just seeing if my approach to a slightly altered question would have been good!
Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
PowerScore Staff
 
Posts: 2476
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:01 pm
Points: 2,291

Yes, Diana, that would have worked, and your breakdown is correct. If "hot days" was sufficient for unsafe smog, and there were some hot days that also had the wind blowing from the east, then on at least those hot days there would be both unsafe smog and wind from the east, and the author's conclusion would have been correct rather than flawed. Nicely done!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam