Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 1:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 1:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:41 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:33 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:29 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:20 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:13 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:27 am
I'm having trouble understanding how C is correct.
doesn't Actors exuberant entail Actors exuberant?
Then if you were to combine that with Shy people actors, wouldn't the diagram be
Shy people actors exuberant ? If so how does C follow? I remember the LR Bible stating that the Some Train can be used to cross over only when there is an all arrow or a biconditional. But since there are two some arrows connecting the diagram I don't see how we can go from exuberant to shy people? Thanks!
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:16 am
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:14 am
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by kitmit2800 — Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by peahnut — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 11:32 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:02 am
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:59 am
Statistics: Posted by jacobwasinger — Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:41 am
Statistics: Posted by Arespermire — Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:31 am
Statistics: Posted by boehmejayne@gmail.com — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:04 am
Statistics: Posted by boehmejayne@gmail.com — Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 1:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:25 am
Hi tkkim,
Answer E can be a bit tricky to negate both because it is conditional and uses the "almost always" wording.
The necessary condition would not be "never" as you've written it, as this is not the logical opposite of "almost always." Instead, something like "Whenever people say they oppose ..., it is not the case that their real concern almost always lies elsewhere." Since this may sound confusing (almost like a double negative), you could probably simplify it to "their real concern sometimes (or occasionally) lies elsewhere."
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:07 am
Statistics: Posted by splashbaboon — Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:28 am
Statistics: Posted by maxtar56 — Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by jacobwasinger — Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:43 pm
Hi Sherri,For the same reason that the passage is more detailed towards Freedom Rides, is B incorrect? Because first half of passage kinda hints towards B?Hi TootyFrooty,
Answer D states "argue that confrontational sit-in tactics were necessary in order for the U.S. civil rights movement to make inroads against racial discrimination in the late 1950s and early 1960s."
There are two main problems with Answer D.
The first is that the passage doesn't actually argue that the sit-in tactics were necessary. The passage does mention that "the influence of these (sit-in) demonstrations on the determination of the student activists was particularly visible in two events: the formation of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and the birth of a second form of sit-ins called Freedom Rides." So while the earlier sit-ins did influence these later activities of the civil rights movement, the idea of necessity isn't mentioned.
The second (and actually more fundamental) problem is that this passage is primarily about the Freedom Rides. (In fact, we refer to this passage as The Freedom Rides passage.) What makes this tricky/confusing is that the Freedom Rides are a form of sit-in, but are not the same as the earlier sit-ins described in Answer A. In the passage, the earlier sit-ins influenced "the birth of a second form of sit-ins called Freedom Rides."
Even though the Freedom Rides are really only discussed in the final paragraph, they are the primary focus of the passage. Specifically, how they changed the civil rights movement. The lines that best capture this are "But the development that marked the clearest turning point for the civil rights movement was the Freedom Rides" and "The Freedom Rides thus helped take the civil rights movement to a new level...." The first two paragraphs set up the historical background/context that led to the Freedom Rides.
The answer that best captures this is Answer A. Note that the "new tactic" mentioned in Answer A refers to the Freedom Rides, not the earlier sit-ins.
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:56 pm
I am having trouble with this assumption question about distribution with estate. AC (A) and (D) both look attractive. I applied the Negation Test (below) and they both seem to hurt the conclusionFor (A), negating it to “No one wants their estate to go to someone they’ve never met” doesn’t necessarily break the argument’s logic. However, for (D), negating it to “People are not generally indifferent about how their estates are distributed” suggests that people do care, which could directly impact the distribution process and thus weakens the conclusion significantly.
(A) Some ppl wants his or her estate to go to someone s/he has never met
(D) Ppl are generally indifferent about how their estates are distributed
Am I not applying the Negation technique correctly?
What makes (D) a superior choice?
As exams approach, preparation becomes paramount. Collaborating with study buddies and free nursing essays can enhance your understanding and retention. Discussing topics, sharing notes, and teaching each other can solidify your grasp on difficult concepts. Additionally, dividing topics among group members for in-depth exploration ensures comprehensive coverage. Utilize online resources and apps for collaborative study sessions, enabling real-time discussions and problem-solving. Remember to review individually to reinforce your understanding. With the support of study partners, you can tackle exams confidently and achieve academic success. So, gather your study squad, share knowledge, and conquer those exams together!
Thanks in advance
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:19 pm
I actually got this question correct but I debated between B and C. C seems to me that it could potentially be correct, since the premise does say that Moore has a "relatively small business" and therefore, perhaps the sample size is too small/unrepresentative and thus could not "warrant the kind of generalization drawn."While both options B and C may seem plausible, option B is preferable because it directly addresses the logical flaw in the argument. Option B focuses on the potential flaw in Moore's reasoning by pointing out that the sample size might not adequately represent the broader population, which weakens the conclusion. On the other hand, option C speculates about the representativeness of the sample, which is not explicitly mentioned in the argument. Option B directly challenges the basis for Moore's conclusion, making it a stronger critique of the argument. Therefore, in this context, option B is a more suitable explanation for why Moore's conclusion may not be valid.Hi Justin,
Can you please explain why B is preferable over C?
Thank you,
curiosity
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:26 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:42 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:35 am
Statistics: Posted by somii_ii — Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:40 am
Statistics: Posted by herdeadwood — Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:33 am
Statistics: Posted by thomas33 — Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by justinmz — Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:15 am
Statistics: Posted by jk3530 — Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:02 am
Statistics: Posted by andy12 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 3:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Sat Mar 09, 2024 11:53 am
Statistics: Posted by Lindsey02 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:38 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:37 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:35 am
Statistics: Posted by yeltz1877 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 1:35 am
Statistics: Posted by yeltz1877 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 12:56 am
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by LJHUNTZ — Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by justinmz — Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:14 am
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 1:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 1:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:53 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:39 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:20 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:03 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:32 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:53 am
Statistics: Posted by saiffshaikhh@gmail.com — Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by thomas33 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Wed Mar 06, 2024 3:36 pm
The president's premises include that the sterilization will make the waste clean and non-polluting, and his argument does indeed rest on that. Our explanation that you cited isn't about whether that is true or not, but is about whether that answer choice addresses the gap in the argument, which is that there could be some opportunity for pollution before the waste is sterilized. Since it is only about what may or may not be true after sterilization, it fails to address that gap.Piggybacking on your first paragraph here, I also was stuck between a and b, primarily because I pre phased that the pollution could be from the steam RELEASED into the environment, such as in the case of industrial manufacturing plants etc... can you clarify further please as to how to see this answer choice in its accurate essence, because clearly I was seeing it as something else.Hi TootyFrooty,
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 3:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by cmd036@bucknell.edu — Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:28 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:19 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 5:47 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:25 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:57 pm
The argument is not explicitly causal, because it only gives evidence of correlation, but the causal relationship is implied, and answer C strengthens the conclusion by explicitly making the relationship causal (one thing warms another = one thing is causing the other to get warmer).Thank you, this is helpful. Just so I know I caught this correctly. I understand what you mean by having the atmosphere be a part of global atmosphere, like the air we breathe?
While we do teach the concepts of Supporter and Defender in the context of Assumption questions, we also do talk about the close relationship between Strengthen and Assumption questions, and Strengthen answers do tend to either close a gap in the argument (Supporter) or fix a weakness in the argument (Defender). The same ideas apply, with the difference being that the Strengthen answer may not be entirely necessary, just helpful, while the Assumption answer is absolutely necessary for the argument to make any sense.
"Atmosphere" is within the scope of the argument, because the conclusion is about the temperature of the global atmosphere. The problem with answer D is that it doesn't strengthen the argument, and might hurt it, because it basically means that the Earth's surface doesn't matter that much; what matters is the sunlight passing through the atmosphere on its way down to the surface. And there's no need to speculate about what constitutes the atmosphere; all we need to deal with is whether reflecting sunlight cools it or not.
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Tue Mar 05, 2024 12:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:59 am
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:54 am
Statistics: Posted by presleys — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:59 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:52 am
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Mon Mar 04, 2024 10:32 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:03 am
The cosmic dust in answer B is still orbiting the sun, but that doesn't mean that the Earth is currently passing through it and filling the atmosphere with dust. Maybe it's just a matter of time before we pass through it again, and then a new ice age will begin. Maybe the orbits of the cosmic dust cloud and the Earth are such that they will never again intersect, and that won't cause another ice age. The cloud is still out there somewhere, but that's not what causes the ice age. It's only when the Earth passes through it that we get that effect.Hi Adam, During timed condition, i was down to (B) and (D). I had two concerns, which made be choose (B) over (D):
B helps because it ties the start of the regular cycle of ice ages to the creation of the dust cloud. In other words, the cause and the effect happened around the same time as each other. The timing looks right, which helps, and that makes B a wrong answer.
1. (B) says ''continues to orbit the Sun'', hence we should have multiple ice-age cycles.But you explained above that ''may be earth has not crossed the dust cloud's path yet'' OR ''maybe earth has a different''. So it answers my first concern.
2. Stimulus says ''when the fluctuations occur, Earth passes through clouds of cosmic dust''In the hindsight, i now see that option never says, ''Fluctuation caused the cosmic dust''.
While evaluating (B) i thought:
So, its not the fluctuations which caused the cosmic dust, rather it was the asteroids. Therefore (B) gives us a alternate cause.
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:29 am
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by onthemic — Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:54 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:40 am
Statistics: Posted by KrippaTrippa — Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:37 am
Hi nivernova,
I think the problem you're having is that you're reading answer choice B as a "soft" claim, when it's actually making an absolute/universal (very "strong") claim. When answer choice B says "The daily challenges with which an environment confronts its inhabitants...," the "an" is universal. It means the same as saying, "The daily challenges with which any environment confronts its inhabitants..." Given the strength of that language, the counterexample in the stimulus (the different environments the Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals lived in) is enough to contradict it.
If the test makers wanted you to read answer choice B as a "soft" claim, the way I think you're reading it, they would've written, "The daily challenges with which some environments confront their inhabitants are unique to those environments." If the answer were written that way, you're right that it could be true under the stimulus and would be an incorrect answer.
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:18 am
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Fri Mar 01, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:21 pm
Hi,Hi Ronaldo,
However, there isn't any precision regarding how often injuries are sustained on both kinds of turfs besides "fewer injuries on artificial-turf athletic fields than on natural-grass fields."
It could be 2 injuries per season on the natural grass field and 1 on the artificial one. I'm not quite sure to understand how answer B would be correct in that case.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by kitmit2800 — Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Pandaa — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 12:31 pm
(F) Most impulsive adults are not at all sensitive to dopamine.I understand, it is never recommended to discuss option(F), but it could help me to understand option (A) better.
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:07 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 11:31 pm
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by piercebarry — Wed Feb 28, 2024 6:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 3:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by ltowns1 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by SiyaMajmundar — Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:41 am
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Tue Feb 27, 2024 8:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:40 am
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 7:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by cmd036@bucknell.edu — Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Mon Feb 26, 2024 1:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by svazquez88 — Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by AnaSol — Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:41 am
Statistics: Posted by jk3530 — Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:53 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 1:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by schocktherapy — Fri Feb 23, 2024 1:02 am
Statistics: Posted by madelineunruh01 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by madelineunruh01 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by sammohamed — Thu Feb 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 2:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:52 am
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:18 am
Dear Powerscore,
I looked at the explanation however I am still confused on how the stimulus was diagramed.
I thought that the first sentence is diagramed as:
Able to Aleviate Economic Injustice OR Economic System will not lead to intolerable econic inequaties--->Nation Redistributes Wealth
It was diagramed as one statement in the answers.
Redistribute wealth → $ Injustice → $ Inequality
I know that unless, introduces the necessary and negates the sufficient.
So, if I have: A or B, unless C
it will be diagramed as: (bc if I negate or it becomes and) please let me know if it looks correct.
not A and not B--->C correct?
So, please let me know how to negate or/and statements when i have unless negating it. Also, how to diagram the first statment in this stimulus because I had and statment and they seem to have an or statement.
Thanks
Ellen
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:42 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:02 am
Statistics: Posted by marissacalderon — Thu Feb 22, 2024 4:56 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 2:56 am
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:15 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:14 pm
Answer choice (B): Like answer choice (A) above, this choice provides an irrelevant consideration. The price of one type of treatment vs. the other tells us nothing about the comparison between dollars spent in treatment today vs. dollars spent ten years ago.But B does compare cost today of nonstandard treatments vs cost 10 years ago of non-standard treatments. I eliminated this because this comparison of costs just for nonstandard treatment is still not sufficient to say anything about money spent on standard treatment.
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:08 am
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:27 am
Statistics: Posted by captwentworth — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:21 am
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:21 pm
So an inference is: N ONThis is close. However, note the possibility that N could be the first stop. As the administrator notes, "if N appears in stops 2-6, then O must precede it." Given that N could appear as the first stop, we can't infer that whenever N occurs, it must be preceded by O.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by LegallyUnProficient — Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by tmd145 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by tmd145 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 12:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:05 am
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 7:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by AnaSol — Sat Feb 17, 2024 2:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 10:07 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 9:53 am
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:52 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:47 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Feb 15, 2024 5:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:09 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:03 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:32 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:18 am
Statistics: Posted by captwentworth — Wed Feb 14, 2024 10:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:30 pm
Hey there 15! I don;t know that I would approach this one conditionally, but we sure can. The author is assuming that animals that have ample food and do not get much exercise are not, in fact, necessarily healthy. If we are going to do a conditional analysis, we would diagram the relationship between the premises and the assumption as:Hi,
AF + RLE -> H
Here's how we get there:
Premise 1: The animals have ample food and relatively little exercise
Premise 2: Good research relies on the assumption that the animals are healthy
Conclusion: These animals can skew the research results
What's missing? The animals may not, in fact, be healthy
To prove it, negate it - if those animals in the labs, getting that food and not getting much exercise, are healthy, then they will not screw up the research.
I'm not sure what you mean about a premise can be wrong. The goal in an assumption question is to add the missing premise, not to do harm to the existing premises. When you negate the correct answer choice you might do that harm, so if that's what you meant then yes, you got it. Good job!
I did Lab animals not healthy --> ample food and little exercise.
Why is this wrong? Because I see yours in reverse.
Also how do I get better at absorbing what I read in stimulus? I realize I have to read over and over again and feel the need to notate detailed. Maybe I'm doing too many details but I feel like that because I have to watch out for details like some all none, particular words like overall project budget vs single project budget etc... I'm way to slow and I get exhausted after a few questions. Currently getting around 15/25 correct and I really want to get to a place where I only get 1 or 2 wrong, if even. Any advice for all that?
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:40 pm
(25) Upon further study, scientists discovered thatSo the presence of prions does not always lead to CJD.
prions normally exist as harmless cellular proteins in
many of the body’s tissues, including white blood cells
and nerve cells in the brain; however, they possess the
capability of converting their structures into a
(30) dangerous abnormal shape.
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:54 am
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:44 am
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:32 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Wed Feb 14, 2024 10:27 am
Answer choice (D): The stimulus deals with the comparison between one entire century and another, so this answer choice, which deals with one small shift during one of the centuries, has no effect on the strength of the author's argument, so this answer choice is incorrect.However, I didn't pick D because: Even though this could have been an alternative reason for why violence increased (because there was a war happening in a specific region in France that might have inflated numbers for overall France), the stimulus says that "violent interpersonal crimes" specifically refers to crimes "not committed in wars", and Answer Choice D doesn't give us enough to say definitively whether violence in Normandy and Gascony was interpersonal (i.e. it could have been both war-related and inter-personal).
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:06 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Feb 14, 2024 8:14 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Tue Feb 13, 2024 6:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Tue Feb 13, 2024 3:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 3:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:15 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 2:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 1:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 1:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 1:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 1:26 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Tue Feb 13, 2024 1:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:27 am
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 12, 2024 7:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 12, 2024 6:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:01 am
Statistics: Posted by legalkitty — Sun Feb 11, 2024 5:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by KokomoJo — Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by jralvendia — Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by jralvendia — Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:46 am
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Desperatenconfused — Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:57 pm
In this method, wells are drilled into porous and permeable rock strata that are already saturated with salt water. Liquid wastes are then injected into the rock strata. Most of these wells are drilled to a depth of at least 300 meters—the minimum depth that generally puts the injected waste at a safe distance below any aquifer, in this case a rock stratum containing drinkable water. Such wells are rarely deeper than 1,800 meters, because below this depth it is more cost-effective to consider an alternative method of disposal.From this section, we know that:
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:22 pm
The temperature will probably be under 32º F tomorrow. The weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow, and the temperature has to be under 32º F for it to snow.The two premises (Must be under 32º to snow/Weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow) lead us to the conclusion (It will probably be under 32º tomorrow). This is a pretty self-explanatory argument!
The temperature will probably be under 32º F tomorrow. Although it's been warm all week, the weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow, and the temperature has to be under 32º F for it to snow."It's been warm all week" is a statement which raises an issue with the conclusion ("The temperature will probably be under 32º tomorrow"). However, the "Although" indicator tells us that the statement is about to be addressed by the following clause, which it is. A counter-premise is a statement that is raised as part of the argument, but is subsequently addressed in a direct manner. Therefore, a counter-premise ultimately strengthens the argument by addressing a potential issue that could weaken it.
Andy: The temperature will probably be under 32º F tomorrow. The weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow, and the temperature has to be under 32º F for it to snow.Bob's response is a statement which weakens the initial argument by directly attacking one of the premises ("The weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow"). Therefore, this is a weakening statement.
Bob: But the weatherman is often wrong when he predicts snow.
Some people claim that it will probably be warm tomorrow, because it's been warm all week. However, the temperature will probably be under 32º F tomorrow. The weatherman says it will probably snow tomorrow, and the temperature has to be under 32º F for it to snow.Do you see how the alternate viewpoint ("some people claim") is simply a delivery device for the counter-premise ("it's been warm all week")? Ultimately, the argument is not weakened, despite the inclusion of this alternate viewpoint—that's why it's not a weakening statement.
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Fri Feb 09, 2024 12:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by npant120 — Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:41 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:16 am
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:57 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:42 am
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Thu Feb 08, 2024 6:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Feb 08, 2024 6:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Thu Feb 08, 2024 6:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by npant120 — Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by npant120 — Thu Feb 08, 2024 4:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 2:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 1:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 12:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 08, 2024 12:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 6:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Wed Feb 07, 2024 5:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 4:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by salgado145 — Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by sammydz — Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Tue Feb 06, 2024 5:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Tue Feb 06, 2024 5:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:14 am
Accepted Distributor buys Backers recoupIn other words, if the committee accepts a film, a distributor will then buy it, in which case backers are assured that they'll recoup their investment. We can draw an inference about this, namely:
Accepted Backers recoupThe third sentence is a Mistaken Negation of this. It reasons that if a film is not accepted, then backers won't recoup their investment. But it's possible that a film could not be accepted by the festival committee and backers still recoup their investment.
Several stars Successful at box office Long run at theatersThis yields a similar inference:
Several stars Long run at theatersThe answer choice then similarly makes a Mistaken Negation--it assumes that because a given film does not have several stars, then it won't have a long run at theaters.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 05, 2024 8:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 05, 2024 8:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by npant120 — Mon Feb 05, 2024 8:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 05, 2024 6:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by lsatboy101 — Mon Feb 05, 2024 4:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by nss210__ — Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by averifoster1@gmail.com — Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by CJ12345: — Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by legally98 — Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:42 am
Statistics: Posted by unfairbear — Sun Feb 04, 2024 12:16 am
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Sat Feb 03, 2024 5:40 pm