Statistics: Posted by Sameer Asad — Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:43 am
Statistics: Posted by salgado145 — Mon Apr 01, 2024 8:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:04 pm
Paragraph One: This paragraph introduces a problem or issue--namely, it notes that recent publicity has been given to the steel industry facing economic problems. The paragraph then adds nuance to this by explaining that the industry consists of several branches, which this paragraph introduces and defines.The author's Tone is reasoned and generally impartial; while the author does indicate that some branches of the steel industry have been hit harder by economic decline than others, this is based on reasoning that the author then provides. The author doesn't necessarily favor or have bias towards one of these branches.
Paragraph Two: This paragraph embellishes on the branches of the steel industry that were introduced in the first paragraph. It specifically emphasizes how two branches--minimills and specialty-steel mills--are an exception to the issue introduced in the first paragraph, that is, it unpacks how they have avoided "the worst of the economic difficulties" (lines 18-19).
Paragraph Three: The third paragraph continues to elaborate on how various branches of the steel industry differ in the economic difficulties they are facing. Whereas the previous paragraph focused on minimills and specialty-steel mills, this one stands in contrast by concentrating on integrated producers. It explains why they are facing economic difficulties (e.g., old equipment).
Paragraph Four: The final paragraph brings the details about minimills, specialty-steel mills, and integrated producers introduced in the previous paragraphs together. It reiterates why some branches like minimills have been able to avoid economic decline better than others like integrated steel producers.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Apr 01, 2024 6:30 pm
I hope you had a wonderful weekend. I’m just starting to study for the logic games portion. On page 26 of the first lesson, I got the answers correct, but my diagram is different than the book. I attached my diagram. Is it still correct, since I got the answers correct? I simply diagramed it shortest to tallest, rather than tallest to shortest.
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:47 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:31 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:21 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:40 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:18 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:18 am
Statistics: Posted by wisnain — Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:27 am
Statistics: Posted by baughy878 — Sun Mar 31, 2024 10:39 am
Statistics: Posted by zoezoe6021 — Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:29 am
Statistics: Posted by trey.holmes22@gmail.com — Sat Mar 30, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:41 am
Statistics: Posted by wisnain — Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:33 am
Statistics: Posted by Overthinker99 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Overthinker99 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by andy12 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:23 am
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:31 am
lp1997,
Thanks for the question! (E) is certainly, in my opinion, the most tempting incorrect answer choice here. Let me try to point out the core issue with it.
Answer choice (E) reads: "The argument presumes, without providing warrant, that because certain conditions only sometimes precede a certain phenomenon, these conditions always bring about the phenomenon." The issue comes in the first part of the answer choice when it says "The author presumes...that because certain conditions only sometimes precede a certain phenomenon..." This misdescribes what is happening in the stimulus. In the stimulus, certain conditions (technological innovations) sometimes bring about a certain phenomenon (economic growth)...but "only sometimes" is different than "sometimes" (sometimes could include always, for example, while "only sometimes" could not). We don't know if these conditions "only sometimes" bring about certain events...for all we know, they could bring them about always (the author then goes on to presume that the conditions bring about certain events always - we don't know that either - we only know that we don't know if they sometimes or always bring them about). Because of the incorrect conflation of "sometimes" and "only sometimes," this answer is incorrect.
Hope that helps,
Alex
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:42 am
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:58 pm
In linking the contrapositive logic /ID --> /UR --> /EW, when investment is decreasing, the economy is NOT weak.You diagrammed correctly but misspoke here - when investment is NOT decreasing, the economy is not weak. Your diagram proves that, and that's why answer choice (A) is correct.
UR --> ID but we know nothing else. Prices could remain constant as they are not linked to ID or UR.All perfectly correct.
(C) MBT for same reasoning in (A)Agreed, that's inferable by a valid chain.
EW --> PRC + UR allows for the economy to be weak AND prices to remain constant, if unemployment rate also decreases.I think more should be said about this. The economy is definitely not weak. That's provable by the contrapositive of the chain. However, since that doesn't require prices to remain constant or otherwise, the second half of this answer could be true, making the entire "or" statement possible.
/PRC or /UR --> /EW allows for unemployment to rise AND economy to be not weak (if prices don't remain constant). It would hinge on activating the OR statement, suggesting /PRC --> /EW while unemployment rises.We can more simply say that this answer must be true. The second element is definitely true, so the whole "or" is true.
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by kqw24 — Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:24 am
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:15 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:21 am
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:44 am
Statistics: Posted by Alize80 — Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:25 am
Statistics: Posted by Overthinker99 — Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:15 am
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:46 pm
I think the correct answer would be "two related positions are discussed, and then each is subjected to criticism"That summary is almost exactly the same as answer choice (A), which is the correct answer. That answer choice states, "Two related positions are discussed, then both are subjected to the same criticism." As you can see, the only difference is that answer choice (A) refers to them being subject to the "same" criticism.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:33 pm
1) For me, the answering process on LR is mostly very intuitive. Of course, the intuition is formed by consistent practice over a period of 3 months, but when it comes to journaling, and specifically the part where I have to write WHY I chose the answer I did, becomes slightly tricky. In that sense, then journaling sometimes doesn't feel very effective for me. Do you think there is a way to tackle this so I can journal effectively or is there some alternative to journaling altogether?That's totally fine if you don't think that journaling would be useful in your situation. To distill a reason that Emily suggested doing so, it's of paramount importance to understand why you are getting questions wrong to be able to make more strides in improving your score. I'm of the opinion that, given the amount of time between you and test day, the most useful thing for you to do at this point would be to take as many full, timed practice tests as possible. But doing the test alone wouldn't be all you'd want to do--rather, you'd want to make sure you review each full test after you take it, and really work to understand why you selected wrong answers and why correct answers are right. That can go a long way in helping prevent you from making similar mistakes again, and it may also help you catch some of the strategies and tricks that the test makers repeatedly use.
2) For LG, I am doing good on all sorts of games except Mapping games mostly. There's also very less practice games for Mapping games. How would you suggest I go about those?Since there aren't as many of this type of game, that suggests that it's potentially feasible for you to do all the practice games available. I think it'd make a lot of sense to do them together as a drill--for instance, perhaps doing a handful and then reviewing them, then doing another handful and reviewing them, until you've completed all the practice games.
3) There's no specific pattern to which questions I get wrong on the LR. It is mostly strengthen questions with Conditionality/CE which I am drilling but other than that it's just different 3-4 questions in the Last 10 usually. So, the effective strategy would then be doing Test Sections for LR and Super Sets perhaps?Given that there's no specific pattern, I think this bolsters my suggestion to take as many practice tests as possible. If you can spare 5 hours daily, that should give you enough time to complete a full test and review it. Since you hope to score at least a 171, that means you need to be getting through all of the LR questions, so keeping up the practice can hopefully help your endurance and make it less likely that you miss questions later into the section as you note.
4) Lastly, unfortunately I have to give the LSAT remotely because test centre in my country is closed on test day on account of a National holiday and the LSAC refused to reschedule my test. Any specific tips or prep points for the remote LSAT?If you can, try to keep up the same routine as much as possible, and keep that routine going on test day. For example, take your practice tests at the same time of day that you'll be taking the actual test and generally simulate the testing conditions when you're taking practice tests, so that when the test day comes it won't be much different from what you've been doing anyways.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by hifigirl — Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Mar 27, 2024 9:18 am
Statistics: Posted by zoezoe6021 — Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:05 am
Statistics: Posted by Sameer Asad — Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 6:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 6:15 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 5:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 5:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by hifigirl — Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by hifigirl — Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by hifigirl — Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by lonvely — Tue Mar 26, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by zoezoe6021 — Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:08 am
Statistics: Posted by CJ12345: — Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:46 am
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by shakinotstirred — Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by shakinotstirred — Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by shakinotstirred — Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:33 pm
Hello,Hi ZenGen,
This was a great webinar, thank you for hosting the topic!
I noticed while watching the replay via the link sent by email that after the hiccup that happens at the 1:05:35 point of the video, I could hear the audio, but could only see a blank screen all the way to the end of the recording. I did wonder if the problem was perhaps on my end as I usually watch these recordings on my tablet, but I've never had this issue before.
Is there a way to access the last slides of the presentation? Or should I request another link via email?
Oddly also the length of the video shows as 4:15:03
Thanks.
Statistics: Posted by ZenGen — Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:22 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:32 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:30 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:15 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:51 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:30 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:19 am
Statistics: Posted by Meshal Alotaibi — Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Sameer Asad — Sun Mar 24, 2024 1:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by CJ12345: — Sun Mar 24, 2024 1:21 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:42 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:21 am
Statistics: Posted by ZenGen — Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:12 am
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:50 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:42 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:37 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:32 am
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:23 am
Statistics: Posted by Overthinker99 — Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:34 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:51 am
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:13 pm
For (C), the correct answer, we are to suppose that the advertisers, despite potential higher earnings, withdrew from the publication for moral reasonsThat seems correct. As answer choice (C) states, "The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew." This means that, by withdrawing, they made a decision to leave the publication despite financial considerations that recommended against doing so.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Wed Mar 20, 2024 5:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Wed Mar 20, 2024 10:49 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Mar 19, 2024 8:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by thomas33 — Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by delialsat02 — Tue Mar 19, 2024 11:54 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Tue Mar 19, 2024 11:36 am
Hey Tk,
If Actors exuberant then some exuberant people are actors yes, but we wouldn't want to write the rule like this because if we write Actors exuberant than we are implying that not all actors are exuberant - and that's not what the stimulus is saying.
If we add shy people into the mix, then we get Shy Actors Exuberant Extroverts.
So if you follow that logic, at least one person can be shy, be an actor, and therefore be exuberant as well.
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:41 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:33 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:29 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:20 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:13 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:27 am
I'm having trouble understanding how C is correct.
doesn't Actors exuberant entail Actors exuberant?
Then if you were to combine that with Shy people actors, wouldn't the diagram be
Shy people actors exuberant ? If so how does C follow? I remember the LR Bible stating that the Some Train can be used to cross over only when there is an all arrow or a biconditional. But since there are two some arrows connecting the diagram I don't see how we can go from exuberant to shy people? Thanks!
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:16 am
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:14 am
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by kitmit2800 — Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by peahnut — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Fri Mar 15, 2024 11:32 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:02 am
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:59 am
Statistics: Posted by jacobwasinger — Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:41 am
Statistics: Posted by Arespermire — Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:31 am
Statistics: Posted by boehmejayne@gmail.com — Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:04 am
Statistics: Posted by boehmejayne@gmail.com — Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 1:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:25 am
Hi tkkim,
Answer E can be a bit tricky to negate both because it is conditional and uses the "almost always" wording.
The necessary condition would not be "never" as you've written it, as this is not the logical opposite of "almost always." Instead, something like "Whenever people say they oppose ..., it is not the case that their real concern almost always lies elsewhere." Since this may sound confusing (almost like a double negative), you could probably simplify it to "their real concern sometimes (or occasionally) lies elsewhere."
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:07 am
Statistics: Posted by splashbaboon — Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:28 am
Statistics: Posted by maxtar56 — Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by jacobwasinger — Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:43 pm
Hi Sherri,For the same reason that the passage is more detailed towards Freedom Rides, is B incorrect? Because first half of passage kinda hints towards B?Hi TootyFrooty,
Answer D states "argue that confrontational sit-in tactics were necessary in order for the U.S. civil rights movement to make inroads against racial discrimination in the late 1950s and early 1960s."
There are two main problems with Answer D.
The first is that the passage doesn't actually argue that the sit-in tactics were necessary. The passage does mention that "the influence of these (sit-in) demonstrations on the determination of the student activists was particularly visible in two events: the formation of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and the birth of a second form of sit-ins called Freedom Rides." So while the earlier sit-ins did influence these later activities of the civil rights movement, the idea of necessity isn't mentioned.
The second (and actually more fundamental) problem is that this passage is primarily about the Freedom Rides. (In fact, we refer to this passage as The Freedom Rides passage.) What makes this tricky/confusing is that the Freedom Rides are a form of sit-in, but are not the same as the earlier sit-ins described in Answer A. In the passage, the earlier sit-ins influenced "the birth of a second form of sit-ins called Freedom Rides."
Even though the Freedom Rides are really only discussed in the final paragraph, they are the primary focus of the passage. Specifically, how they changed the civil rights movement. The lines that best capture this are "But the development that marked the clearest turning point for the civil rights movement was the Freedom Rides" and "The Freedom Rides thus helped take the civil rights movement to a new level...." The first two paragraphs set up the historical background/context that led to the Freedom Rides.
The answer that best captures this is Answer A. Note that the "new tactic" mentioned in Answer A refers to the Freedom Rides, not the earlier sit-ins.
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:56 pm
I am having trouble with this assumption question about distribution with estate. AC (A) and (D) both look attractive. I applied the Negation Test (below) and they both seem to hurt the conclusionFor (A), negating it to “No one wants their estate to go to someone they’ve never met” doesn’t necessarily break the argument’s logic. However, for (D), negating it to “People are not generally indifferent about how their estates are distributed” suggests that people do care, which could directly impact the distribution process and thus weakens the conclusion significantly.
(A) Some ppl wants his or her estate to go to someone s/he has never met
(D) Ppl are generally indifferent about how their estates are distributed
Am I not applying the Negation technique correctly?
What makes (D) a superior choice?
As exams approach, preparation becomes paramount. Collaborating with study buddies and free nursing essays can enhance your understanding and retention. Discussing topics, sharing notes, and teaching each other can solidify your grasp on difficult concepts. Additionally, dividing topics among group members for in-depth exploration ensures comprehensive coverage. Utilize online resources and apps for collaborative study sessions, enabling real-time discussions and problem-solving. Remember to review individually to reinforce your understanding. With the support of study partners, you can tackle exams confidently and achieve academic success. So, gather your study squad, share knowledge, and conquer those exams together!
Thanks in advance
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:19 pm
I actually got this question correct but I debated between B and C. C seems to me that it could potentially be correct, since the premise does say that Moore has a "relatively small business" and therefore, perhaps the sample size is too small/unrepresentative and thus could not "warrant the kind of generalization drawn."While both options B and C may seem plausible, option B is preferable because it directly addresses the logical flaw in the argument. Option B focuses on the potential flaw in Moore's reasoning by pointing out that the sample size might not adequately represent the broader population, which weakens the conclusion. On the other hand, option C speculates about the representativeness of the sample, which is not explicitly mentioned in the argument. Option B directly challenges the basis for Moore's conclusion, making it a stronger critique of the argument. Therefore, in this context, option B is a more suitable explanation for why Moore's conclusion may not be valid.Hi Justin,
Can you please explain why B is preferable over C?
Thank you,
curiosity
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:26 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:42 am
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:35 am
Statistics: Posted by somii_ii — Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:40 am
Statistics: Posted by herdeadwood — Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:33 am
Statistics: Posted by thomas33 — Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by justinmz — Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:15 am
Statistics: Posted by jk3530 — Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:02 am
Statistics: Posted by andy12 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 3:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Sat Mar 09, 2024 11:53 am
Statistics: Posted by Lindsey02 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:38 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:37 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:35 am
Statistics: Posted by yeltz1877 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 1:35 am
Statistics: Posted by yeltz1877 — Sat Mar 09, 2024 12:56 am
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by LJHUNTZ — Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by justinmz — Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:14 am
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 1:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Mar 07, 2024 1:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:53 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:39 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:20 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:03 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:32 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:53 am
Statistics: Posted by saiffshaikhh@gmail.com — Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by thomas33 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Wed Mar 06, 2024 3:36 pm
The president's premises include that the sterilization will make the waste clean and non-polluting, and his argument does indeed rest on that. Our explanation that you cited isn't about whether that is true or not, but is about whether that answer choice addresses the gap in the argument, which is that there could be some opportunity for pollution before the waste is sterilized. Since it is only about what may or may not be true after sterilization, it fails to address that gap.Piggybacking on your first paragraph here, I also was stuck between a and b, primarily because I pre phased that the pollution could be from the steam RELEASED into the environment, such as in the case of industrial manufacturing plants etc... can you clarify further please as to how to see this answer choice in its accurate essence, because clearly I was seeing it as something else.Hi TootyFrooty,
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 3:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by cmd036@bucknell.edu — Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dave Killoran — Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:28 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:19 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 5:47 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:25 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:57 pm
The argument is not explicitly causal, because it only gives evidence of correlation, but the causal relationship is implied, and answer C strengthens the conclusion by explicitly making the relationship causal (one thing warms another = one thing is causing the other to get warmer).Thank you, this is helpful. Just so I know I caught this correctly. I understand what you mean by having the atmosphere be a part of global atmosphere, like the air we breathe?
While we do teach the concepts of Supporter and Defender in the context of Assumption questions, we also do talk about the close relationship between Strengthen and Assumption questions, and Strengthen answers do tend to either close a gap in the argument (Supporter) or fix a weakness in the argument (Defender). The same ideas apply, with the difference being that the Strengthen answer may not be entirely necessary, just helpful, while the Assumption answer is absolutely necessary for the argument to make any sense.
"Atmosphere" is within the scope of the argument, because the conclusion is about the temperature of the global atmosphere. The problem with answer D is that it doesn't strengthen the argument, and might hurt it, because it basically means that the Earth's surface doesn't matter that much; what matters is the sunlight passing through the atmosphere on its way down to the surface. And there's no need to speculate about what constitutes the atmosphere; all we need to deal with is whether reflecting sunlight cools it or not.
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Mar 05, 2024 3:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Tue Mar 05, 2024 12:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:59 am
Statistics: Posted by CristinaCP — Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:54 am
Statistics: Posted by presleys — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by Adam Tyson — Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:21 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:59 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:52 am
Statistics: Posted by Administrator — Mon Mar 04, 2024 10:32 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:03 am
The cosmic dust in answer B is still orbiting the sun, but that doesn't mean that the Earth is currently passing through it and filling the atmosphere with dust. Maybe it's just a matter of time before we pass through it again, and then a new ice age will begin. Maybe the orbits of the cosmic dust cloud and the Earth are such that they will never again intersect, and that won't cause another ice age. The cloud is still out there somewhere, but that's not what causes the ice age. It's only when the Earth passes through it that we get that effect.Hi Adam, During timed condition, i was down to (B) and (D). I had two concerns, which made be choose (B) over (D):
B helps because it ties the start of the regular cycle of ice ages to the creation of the dust cloud. In other words, the cause and the effect happened around the same time as each other. The timing looks right, which helps, and that makes B a wrong answer.
1. (B) says ''continues to orbit the Sun'', hence we should have multiple ice-age cycles.But you explained above that ''may be earth has not crossed the dust cloud's path yet'' OR ''maybe earth has a different''. So it answers my first concern.
2. Stimulus says ''when the fluctuations occur, Earth passes through clouds of cosmic dust''In the hindsight, i now see that option never says, ''Fluctuation caused the cosmic dust''.
While evaluating (B) i thought:
So, its not the fluctuations which caused the cosmic dust, rather it was the asteroids. Therefore (B) gives us a alternate cause.
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:29 am
Statistics: Posted by katem2002 — Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by onthemic — Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:54 am
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:40 am
Statistics: Posted by KrippaTrippa — Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:37 am
Hi nivernova,
I think the problem you're having is that you're reading answer choice B as a "soft" claim, when it's actually making an absolute/universal (very "strong") claim. When answer choice B says "The daily challenges with which an environment confronts its inhabitants...," the "an" is universal. It means the same as saying, "The daily challenges with which any environment confronts its inhabitants..." Given the strength of that language, the counterexample in the stimulus (the different environments the Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals lived in) is enough to contradict it.
If the test makers wanted you to read answer choice B as a "soft" claim, the way I think you're reading it, they would've written, "The daily challenges with which some environments confront their inhabitants are unique to those environments." If the answer were written that way, you're right that it could be true under the stimulus and would be an incorrect answer.
Statistics: Posted by tkkim7 — Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:18 am
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Fri Mar 01, 2024 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:21 pm
Hi,Hi Ronaldo,
However, there isn't any precision regarding how often injuries are sustained on both kinds of turfs besides "fewer injuries on artificial-turf athletic fields than on natural-grass fields."
It could be 2 injuries per season on the natural grass field and 1 on the artificial one. I'm not quite sure to understand how answer B would be correct in that case.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by kitmit2800 — Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Pandaa — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 29, 2024 12:31 pm
(F) Most impulsive adults are not at all sensitive to dopamine.I understand, it is never recommended to discuss option(F), but it could help me to understand option (A) better.
Statistics: Posted by ashutosh_73 — Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:07 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 11:31 pm
Statistics: Posted by LSATQueen2024 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:42 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by piercebarry — Wed Feb 28, 2024 6:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 3:02 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:44 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by ltowns1 — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:45 pm
Statistics: Posted by Chandler H — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by SiyaMajmundar — Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:41 am
Statistics: Posted by ronaldofenomeno — Tue Feb 27, 2024 8:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:53 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by EmilyOwens — Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:40 am
Statistics: Posted by Justandrea13 — Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 7:18 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by cmd036@bucknell.edu — Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Mon Feb 26, 2024 1:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by svazquez88 — Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by AnaSol — Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by askuwheteau@protonmail.com — Sun Feb 25, 2024 10:41 am
Statistics: Posted by jk3530 — Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:53 am
Statistics: Posted by lemonade42 — Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:59 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 23, 2024 1:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by schocktherapy — Fri Feb 23, 2024 1:02 am
Statistics: Posted by madelineunruh01 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by madelineunruh01 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by sammohamed — Thu Feb 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 3:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 2:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:54 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by sqmusgrave — Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:52 am
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:18 am
Dear Powerscore,
I looked at the explanation however I am still confused on how the stimulus was diagramed.
I thought that the first sentence is diagramed as:
Able to Aleviate Economic Injustice OR Economic System will not lead to intolerable econic inequaties--->Nation Redistributes Wealth
It was diagramed as one statement in the answers.
Redistribute wealth → $ Injustice → $ Inequality
I know that unless, introduces the necessary and negates the sufficient.
So, if I have: A or B, unless C
it will be diagramed as: (bc if I negate or it becomes and) please let me know if it looks correct.
not A and not B--->C correct?
So, please let me know how to negate or/and statements when i have unless negating it. Also, how to diagram the first statment in this stimulus because I had and statment and they seem to have an or statement.
Thanks
Ellen
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:42 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:02 am
Statistics: Posted by marissacalderon — Thu Feb 22, 2024 4:56 am
Statistics: Posted by jimmy1115 — Thu Feb 22, 2024 2:56 am
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:15 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:11 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:30 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:20 pm
Statistics: Posted by Robert Carroll — Wed Feb 21, 2024 3:14 pm
Answer choice (B): Like answer choice (A) above, this choice provides an irrelevant consideration. The price of one type of treatment vs. the other tells us nothing about the comparison between dollars spent in treatment today vs. dollars spent ten years ago.But B does compare cost today of nonstandard treatments vs cost 10 years ago of non-standard treatments. I eliminated this because this comparison of costs just for nonstandard treatment is still not sufficient to say anything about money spent on standard treatment.
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:08 am
Statistics: Posted by valegria — Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:07 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:37 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:29 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:28 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:57 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:22 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:03 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:48 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by Dana D — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:27 am
Statistics: Posted by captwentworth — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:21 am
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by TootyFrooty — Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:50 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:21 pm
So an inference is: N ONThis is close. However, note the possibility that N could be the first stop. As the administrator notes, "if N appears in stops 2-6, then O must precede it." Given that N could appear as the first stop, we can't infer that whenever N occurs, it must be preceded by O.
Statistics: Posted by Luke Haqq — Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:43 pm
Statistics: Posted by LegallyUnProficient — Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:08 pm
Statistics: Posted by tmd145 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by tmd145 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mmjd12 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 12:13 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:05 am
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 7:16 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by AnaSol — Sat Feb 17, 2024 2:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:27 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Sat Feb 17, 2024 1:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 10:07 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Sat Feb 17, 2024 9:53 am
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:01 pm
Statistics: Posted by LawSchoolDream — Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:04 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by teddykim100 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:38 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:12 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:46 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Jeff Wren — Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:14 pm
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:52 am
Statistics: Posted by cd1010 — Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:47 am
Statistics: Posted by Stephanie Oswalt — Thu Feb 15, 2024 5:06 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 3:00 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:23 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:58 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:09 pm
Statistics: Posted by Hanin Abu Amara — Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:48 pm